In Minecraft, the Xeon E5-1620 v3 is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $34 cheaper!
Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Up to 15% cheaper – $189.95 vs $224.17
- Up to 15% cheaper
- Up to 11% better value in Minecraft – $0.17 vs $0.19/FPS
- Up to 11% better value in Minecraft
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft – 1129 vs 1065 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Minecraft
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2014
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Average FPS
1065 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
213 FPS
71%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
1129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
301 FPS
100%
Price, $
$224.17
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
89%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v3 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Sep 8th, 2014
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
10 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v3 Sep 8th, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011-3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
