In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is slightly faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6 – 63 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer – Sep 10, 2013 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 4 years and 2 days newer
Xeon X3430
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
