In Atomfall, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 195 FPS
- Up to 27% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
10 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
