In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is slightly slower than the Core i3-370M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Sep 10, 2013 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
Core i3-370M
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 211 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 35 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-370M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-370M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-370M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
