In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is slightly faster than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 190 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core i3-14100F
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 58 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
89%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
