In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Xeon E5-1620 v2 is slower than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5-1620 v2
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100
- Up to 23% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 116 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 23% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 10, 2013
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 60 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
116 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$141.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
83%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2011 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
