Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2200 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 12% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 326 vs 290 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
326
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, $
$283.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $283.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 297 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |