In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E3-1285L v4 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 177 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 65 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jun 02, 2015
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
99%
Price, $
$569
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
5%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4 Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$445.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
