Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1983 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Resident Evil Village than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 311 vs 299 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
Resident Evil Village
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
311
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$343.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $343.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |