In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1285L v4 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2015
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
6 MB
20%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
69%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
29%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4 Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $445.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
