In F1 24, the Xeon E3-1285L v4 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 45% faster in F1 24 – 220 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 45% faster in F1 24
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2015
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
F1 24 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$442.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
6 MB
17%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
63%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
33%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4 Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$445.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
65W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
