In Deathloop, the Xeon E3-1285L v4 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2015
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 58 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1285L v4 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Jun 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1285L v4 Jun 2nd, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| $445.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
