In Deathloop, the Xeon E3-1280 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1280
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 95 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 73% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jul 30, 2025 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1280 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9970X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Jul 30th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2299.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1280 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Jul 30th, 2025
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3196
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
27474
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1280 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9970X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1280
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
12%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Jul 30th, 2025
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1280 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X Jul 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $2,499.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | sTR5 |
95W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
