In Deathloop, the Xeon E3-1280 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1280
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 220 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 47% less energy – 95 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 47% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1280 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1280 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1280 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1280
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1280 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | SP3r2 |
95W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
