In Control, the Xeon E3-1280 is slightly slower than the Celeron G6900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1280
No clear advantages
Celeron G6900
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 46 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1280 vs Celeron G6900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1280 vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1280 vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1280
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1280 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $52.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 46W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
