In Deathloop, the Xeon E3-1280 v5 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 9 years and 5 days newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 9 years and 5 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1280 v5 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1280 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1280 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| $612.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
