In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1275 v3 is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 84 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1275 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1275 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1275 v3 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1275 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
65%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1275 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
84 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, DDR4 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
