In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1270 is slightly slower than the Core i3-10100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1270
No clear advantages
Core i3-10100
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 27 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 9 years and 27 days newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1270 vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1270 vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1270 vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1270
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
88%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1270 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
