In Rust, the Xeon E3-1270 v5 is slower than the Core i9-14900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1270 v5
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 24% faster in Rust – 278 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
69%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$339.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
