In Rust, the Xeon E3-1270 v5 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10940X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 80 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i9-10940X
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 237 vs 225 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 4 years newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-10940X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-10940X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i9-10940X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
29%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i9-10940X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10940X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $339.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA2066 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
