In Deathloop, the Xeon E3-1270 v5 is slightly slower than the Core i7-14700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 242 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 7 years and 11 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$432.96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1270 v5 vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
71%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$339.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
