In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E3-1270 v3 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 9600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 178 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
170 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
128 FPS
96%
Price, $
$195
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1270 v3 vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
72%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1270 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, DDR4 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
