Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3244 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 142 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7437 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |