In Deathloop, the Xeon E3-1265L v2 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs May 14, 2012
- Is 12 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$284.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1265L v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1265L v2
May 14th, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1265L v2 May 14th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 14th, 2012 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
