Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 36% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 287 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 28 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
287
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |