In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1260L is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 5700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 5700
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6 – 95 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 56% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 1 day newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 11 years and 1 day newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1260L vs Ryzen 7 5700: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
95 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
100%
Price, $
$156.85
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1260L vs Ryzen 7 5700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1260L vs Ryzen 7 5700 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1260L
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 5700
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1260L Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 5700 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Released | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $179.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | AM4 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
