In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1260L is slower than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1260L
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
24%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1260L Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $359.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
