Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 39% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1260L - 211 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 24 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
211
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $319.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |