In Battlefield 6, the Xeon E3-1260L is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-12700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Core i7-12700K
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i7-12700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i7-12700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1260L vs Core i7-12700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1260L
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
32%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
66%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-12700K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1260L Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
