Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3003 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 217 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 28 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$285
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 307 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |