In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E3-1240 v2 is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 191 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs May 14, 2012
- Is 12 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 65 vs 69 Watts
- Consumes up to 6% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
89%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1240 v2 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v2
May 14th, 2012
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1240 v2 May 14th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 14th, 2012 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 69 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
