In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1230 is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 9980X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1230
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 80 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jul 30, 2025 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1230 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9980X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Jul 30th, 2025
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$4599.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$18.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1230 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Jul 30th, 2025
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3112
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
28569
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1230 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9980X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1230
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
8 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
Jul 30th, 2025
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1230 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 9980X Jul 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $4,999.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | sTR5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
