In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1230 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1230
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1230 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1230 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1230 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1230
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
90%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1230 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
