In Deathloop, the Xeon E3-1230 is slightly slower than the Core i5-650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1230
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Apr 03, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
Core i5-650
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 9% less energy – 73 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 9% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1230 vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1230 vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1230 vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1230
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1230 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1156 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 73W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
