In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1230 v5 is slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1230 v5
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 80 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 267 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
267 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
200 FPS
100%
Price, $
$675.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.53/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1230 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
67%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1230 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$261.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
