In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E3-1230 v5 is slightly faster than the Core i9-12900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1230 v5
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 176 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Is 6 years and 16 days newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Oct 19, 2015
- Is 6 years and 16 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
96%
Price, $
$290.64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1230 v5
Oct 19th, 2015
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
73%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1230 v5 Oct 19th, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
$261.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
