In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1230 v3 is slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1230 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 80 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall – 268 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1230 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
268 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
201 FPS
100%
Price, $
$675.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1230 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1230 v3 vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1230 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
6%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1230 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$250.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
