In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1220 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1220
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 6 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1220 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1220 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1220 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1220
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1220 Apr 3rd, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
