In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E3-1220 v3 is slightly faster than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 179 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core Ultra 9 285
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
95%
Price, $
$563.41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1220 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
$203.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
