In Atomfall, the Xeon E3-1220 v3 is slower than the Core i9-13900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E3-1220 v3
No clear advantages
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall – 243 vs 202 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 9 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
243 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
182 FPS
100%
Price, $
$530.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E3-1220 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
$203.00 | MSRP | $524.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
