In Rust, the Xeon E-2314 is slightly faster than the Xeon W3530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2314
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 231 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Sep 08, 2021 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Xeon W3530
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon W3530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon W3530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2314 vs Xeon W3530 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2314
Sep 8th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Xeon W3530
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2314 Sep 8th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3530 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
