In Atomfall, the Xeon E-2314 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2314
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 8 days newer – Sep 08, 2021 vs Aug 31, 2017
- Is 4 years and 8 days newer
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2314 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
207 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
155 FPS
97%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2314 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2314 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2314
Sep 8th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2314 Sep 8th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
$182.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | SP3r2 |
65W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
