In Atomfall, the Xeon E-2314 is slightly faster than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2314
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Sep 08, 2021 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
FX-8300
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2314 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
88%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2314 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2314 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2314
Sep 8th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2314 Sep 8th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM3+ |
65W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
