In Rust, the Xeon E-2314 is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2314
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 231 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer – Sep 08, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 8 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2314 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2314 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2314 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2314
Sep 8th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
33%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2314 Sep 8th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
$182.00 | MSRP | $332.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
