In Rust, the Xeon E-2314 is slightly faster than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2314
- Up to 10% faster in Rust – 230 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Sep 08, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
209 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
71%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2314
Sep 8th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2314 Sep 8th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
