In Helldivers 2, the Xeon E-2314 is slightly faster than the Celeron G1610. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2314
- Up to 2% faster in Helldivers 2 – 194 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Helldivers 2
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer – Sep 08, 2021 vs Dec 03, 2012
- Is 8 years and 9 months newer
Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Helldivers 2 FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron G1610: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
94%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron G1610 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2314 vs Celeron G1610 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2314
Sep 8th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron G1610
Dec 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2314 Sep 8th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G1610 Dec 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 8th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
