In Atomfall, the Xeon E-2286G is slightly faster than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2286G
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 216 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – May 29, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2286G vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
189 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
88%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2286G vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2286G vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2286G
May 29th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2286G May 29th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $450.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
