In Atomfall, the Xeon E-2276G is slightly faster than the Celeron G3930. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2276G
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer – May 29, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 2 years and 4 months newer
Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 51 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2276G vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
191 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
88%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2276G vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2276G vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2276G
May 29th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2276G May 29th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $362.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| HD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
