In Deathloop, the Xeon E-2224 is slightly slower than the Xeon W3670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2224
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – May 29, 2019 vs Aug 29, 2010
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 45% less energy – 71 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 45% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3670
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2224 vs Xeon W3670: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2224 vs Xeon W3670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2224 vs Xeon W3670 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2224
May 29th, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon W3670
Aug 29th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2224 May 29th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3670 Aug 29th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
| $193.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
71W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
