In Control, the Xeon E-2224 is slightly faster than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E-2224
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – May 29, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 51 vs 71 Watts
- Consumes up to 28% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E-2224 vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
245 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E-2224 vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E-2224 vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E-2224
May 29th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E-2224 May 29th, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $193.00 | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 71W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
